MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT,
Published online in Articles in Advance, September 9, 2008
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1080.0226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Jukic, B.

Optimal Scheduling and Incentive Compatible Pricing for a Service System with Quality of Service Guarantees

Vernon N. Hsu, Susan H. Xu, Boris Jukic

Australian School of Business, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, and School of Management, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
School of Business, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699

vhsu{at}gmu.edu
shx{at}psu.edu
bjukic{at}clarkson.edu

This paper proposes a resource allocation and pricing mechanism for a service system that serves multiple classes of jobs within an organization. Each class of service request is subject to a class-dependent quality of service (QoS) guarantee on the expected delay bound, which may be imposed by business rules in an organization or other application-specific technical constraints. We develop an extension of a resource allocation and pricing mechanism for an M/M/1 system. In contrast to the system without the QoS guarantee, where a fixed priority scheduling policy—known as the rule—is optimal, we show that the system may need to adopt a more general randomized priority scheduling policy to maximize the overall system profit. We also develop a transfer pricing scheme that is both optimal and incentive compatible, allowing users to act in their self-interests while collectively achieving the system optimum. We show that the pricing scheme with the QoS guarantee depends on the scheduling policy implemented and has different characteristics from that without the QoS guarantee.

Key Words: capacity planning and investment; technology management and process design; service operations
History: Received: May 24, 2006; accepted: February 12, 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.