MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 9, No. 4, Fall 2007, pp. 518-534
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1060.0150
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeHoratius, N.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Store Manager Incentive Design and Retail Performance: An Exploratory Investigation

Nicole DeHoratius, Ananth Raman

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Harvard Business School, Morgan Hall, Soldiers Field, Boston, Massachusetts 02163

nicole.dehoratius{at}chicagogsb.edu
araman{at}hbs.edu

Store managers perform multiple tasks within a store, and the way in which they are evaluated and rewarded for these tasks affects their behavior. Using empirical data from multiple stores of a consumer electronics retailer, Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, we highlight the extent to which store manager incentive design impacts store manager behavior and, consequently, retail performance. More specifically, we describe the shift in store manager behavior resulting from a change in incentives, which, in part, altered the importance of sales relative to inventory shrinkage in the store manager compensation plan. Store managers, following this change, directed less attention to the prevention of inventory shrinkage and more toward sales-generating activities and made different process choices within the store. We observed increases in the level of inventory shrinkage and sales within these stores. Controlling for alternative drivers of sales and inventory shrinkage, we find this change in incentive design to be associated with a profit improvement of 4.2% of sales. This work indicates that altering how store managers are compensated impacts retail performance. Moreover, our findings underscore the importance of balancing the rewards given for different types of activities in contexts where agents face multiple competing tasks.

Key Words: incentives; multitasking agent; retail operations; inventory shrinkage; quasi-experimental; store management
History: Received: April 15, 2005; accepted: December 5, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
N. DeHoratius and A. Raman
Inventory Record Inaccuracy: An Empirical Analysis
Management Science, April 1, 2008; 54(4): 627 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
M. Fisher
Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 368 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.