MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 9, No. 4, Fall 2007, pp. 457-479
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1060.0149
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by P. Cachon, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

In Search of the Bullwhip Effect

Gérard P. Cachon, Taylor Randall, Glen M. Schmidt

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

cachon{at}wharton.upenn.edu
taylor.randall{at}business.utah.edu
glen.schmidt{at}business.utah.edu

The bullwhip effect is the phenomenon of increasing demand variability in the supply chain from downstream echelons (retail) to upstream echelons (manufacturing). The objective of this study is to document the strength of the bullwhip effect in industry-level U.S. data. In particular, we say an industry exhibits the bullwhip effect if the variance of the inflow of material to the industry (what macroeconomists often refer to as the variance of an industry's "production") is greater than the variance of the industry's sales. We find that wholesale industries exhibit a bullwhip effect, but retail industries generally do not exhibit the effect, nor do most manufacturing industries. Furthermore, we observe that manufacturing industries do not have substantially greater demand volatility than retail industries. Based on theoretical explanations for observing or not observing demand amplification, we are able to explain a substantial portion of the heterogeneity in the degree to which industries exhibit the bullwhip effect. In particular, the less seasonal an industry's demand, the more likely the industry amplifies volatility—highly seasonal industries tend to smooth demand volatility whereas nonseasonal industries tend to amplify.

Key Words: bullwhip effect; production smoothing; supply chain management; volatility
History: Received: April 29, 2005; accepted: December 6, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
M. Fisher
Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 368 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
S. Rumyantsev and S. Netessine
What Can Be Learned from Classical Inventory Models? A Cross-Industry Exploratory Investigation
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 409 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.