MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 8, No. 2, Spring 2006, pp. 192-205
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1060.0099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muriel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Impact of Partial Manufacturing Flexibility on Production Variability

Ana Muriel, Anand Somasundaram, Yongmei Zhang

University of Massachusetts, and Universidad de Salamanca (Spain), 160 Governors Drive, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
Sony Entertainment Distribution, 555/21 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022
4Rsystems Inc., 1400 Liberty Ridge Drive, Suite 102, Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania 19087

muriel{at}ecs.umass.edu
anand_somasundaram{at}sonymusic.com
yzhang{at}4rsystems.com

As manufacturers in various industries evolve toward predominantly make-to-order production to better serve their customers’ needs, increasing product mix flexibility emerges as a necessary strategy to provide adequate market responsiveness. However, the implications of increased flexibility on overall system performance are widely unknown. We develop analytical models and an optimization-based simulation tool to study the impact of increasing flexibility on shortages, production variability, component inventories, and order variability induced at upstream suppliers in general multiplant multiproduct make-to-order manufacturing systems. Our results show that

  1. Partial flexibility leads to a considerable increase in production variability, and consequently in higher component inventory levels and upstream order variability. Although a modest increase in flexibility yields most of the sales benefits, production variability is reduced as more flexibility is added to the system. Consequently, investments in additional flexibility may be justified when component inventories are expensive, or simply by the benefits associated with the smoother production.
  2. The performance of flexible systems is highly dependent on the capacity allocation policies implemented. Policies that evenly distribute product demands to the available plants lead to consistently better performance because they avoid the misplacement of inventories by replicating the performance of a single-plant system.

These insights and the simulation tool can be used by practitioners to guide the design of their flexible production systems, trading off the initial capital outlay versus the sales benefits and the expected operational costs.

Key Words: manufacturing capacity and flexibility planning; production variability; demand allocation; make-to-order manufacturing systems
History: Received: April 22, 2002; accepted: September 2, 2005.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.