MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 7, No. 3, Summer 2005, pp. 208-228
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1050.0080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, S.
Right arrow Articles by Aras, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products

Saibal Ray, Tamer Boyaci, Necati Aras

Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, PQ, H3A 2M1, Canada
Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, PQ, H3A 2M1, Canada
Industrial Engineering Department, Bogaziçi University, Bebek, Istanbul, 34342, Turkey

saibal.ray{at}mcgill.ca
tamer.boyaci{at}mcgill.ca
arasn{at}boun.edu.tr

Most durable products have two distinct types of customers: first-time buyers and customers who already own the product, but are willing to replace it with a new one or purchase a second one. Firms usually adopt a price-discrimination policy by offering a trade-in rebate only to the replacement customers to hasten their purchase decisions. Any return flow of products induced by trade-in rebates has the potential to generate revenues through remanufacturing operations. In this paper, we study the optimal pricing/trade-in strategies for such durable, remanufacturable products. We focus on the scenario where the replacement customers are only interested in trade-ins. In this setting, we study three pricing schemes: (i) uniform price for all customers, (ii) age-independent price differentiation between new and replacement customers (i.e., constant rebate for replacement customers), and (iii) age-dependent price differentiation between new and replacement customers (i.e., age-dependent rebates for replacement customers). We characterize the roles that the durability of the product, the extent of return revenues, the age profile of existing products in the market, and the relative size of the two customer segments play in shaping the optimal prices and the amount of trade-in rebates offered. Throughout the paper we highlight the operational decisions that might influence the above factors, and we support our findings with real-life practices. In an extensive numerical study, we compare the profit potential of different pricing schemes and quantify the reward (penalty) associated with taking into account (ignoring) customer segmentation, the price-discrimination option, return revenues, and the age profile of existing products. On the basis of these results, we are able to identify the most favorable pricing strategy for the firm when faced with a particular market condition and discuss implications on the life-cycle pricing of durable, remanufacturable products.

Key Words: trade-in rebates; pricing; remanufacturing; durable products; product-age profile
History: Received: January 10, 2003; accepted: May 7, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
V. D. R. Guide Jr. and L. N. Van Wassenhove
OR FORUM--The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
Operations Research, January 1, 2009; 57(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.