MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 3, No. 2, Spring 2001, pp. 105-121
DOI: 10.1287/msom.3.2.105.9988
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Véricourt, F. d.
Right arrow Articles by Dallery, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Assessing the Benefits of Different Stock-Allocation Policies for a Make-to-Stock Production System

Francis de Véricourt, Fikri Karaesmen, Yves Dallery

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Laboratoire Productique Logistique, École Centrale Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, 92295 Chatenay-Malabry Cedex, France
Laboratoire Productique Logistique, École Centrale Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, 92295 Chatenay-Malabry Cedex, France

fdv1{at}mail.duke.edu
fikri{at}pl.ecp.fr
dallery{at}pl.ecp.fr

We consider a manufacturing facility that produces a single item that is demanded by several different classes of customers. The inventory-related cost performance of such a system can be improved by effective allocation of production and inventories. We obtain the optimal parameters for three easily implementable allocation policies. Our results cover the case of linear backorder costs as well as fill-rate constraints. We compare the optimal performance of these control policies to gain insights into the benefits of different production and stock-allocation rules.

Key Words: Inventory/Production; Optimal Policies; Stock Allocation; Queues; Make-to-Stock System
History: Received: December 31, 1999;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
R. A. Shumsky and F. Zhang
Dynamic Capacity Management with Substitution
Operations Research, May 1, 2009; 57(3): 671 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
B. Huang and S. M. R. Iravani
Technical Note--A Make-to-Stock System with Multiple Customer Classes and Batch Ordering
Operations Research, September 1, 2008; 56(5): 1312 - 1320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
F. Bernstein and F. de Vericourt
Competition for Procurement Contracts with Service Guarantees
Operations Research, May 1, 2008; 56(3): 562 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. Benjaafar, W. L. Cooper, and J.-S. Kim
On the Benefits of Pooling in Production-Inventory Systems
Management Science, April 1, 2005; 51(4): 548 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. Benjaafar, M. ElHafsi, and F. d. Vericourt
Demand Allocation in Multiple-Product, Multiple-Facility, Make-to-Stock Systems
Management Science, October 1, 2004; 50(10): 1431 - 1448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
F. de Vericourt, F. Karaesmen, and Y. Dallery
Optimal Stock Allocation for a Capacitated Supply System
Management Science, November 1, 2002; 48(11): 1486 - 1501.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by INFORMS.