MSOM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Vol. 11, No. 4, Fall 2009, pp. 613-629
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1080.0241
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, H.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminsky, P.

Inventory, Discounts, and the Timing Effect

Hyun-Soo Ahn, Mehmet Gümüs, Philip Kaminsky

Department of Operations and Management Science, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada
Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720

hsahn{at}bus.umich.edu
mehmet.gumus{at}mcgill.ca
kaminsky{at}ieor.berkeley.edu

We introduce and analyze a model that explicitly considers the timing effect of intertemporal pricing—the concept, found in practice, that demand during a sale is increasing in the time since the last sale. We present structural results that characterize the interaction between the decision to hold a sale and the inventory-ordering decision. We show that the optimal inventory-ordering policy is a state-dependent base-stock policy; however, the optimal pricing policy can be quite complicated due to both the value and the cost of holding inventory and delaying sales. In our computational analysis, we find that compared to a fixed-price policy, we see an average gain in profit of almost 5% from optimally varying promotion and inventory decisions accounting for intertemporal demand, and we find that this potential profit gain increases as demand variability decreases. We also develop a heuristic based on deterministic pricing and find that it performs well relative to the optimal policy.

Key Words: inventory; policies; pricing; uncertainty; stochastic
History: Received: September 17, 2007; accepted: August 29, 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.